BlobOperations: A JDBC PostgreSQL BLOB abstraction
BlobOperations
provides a JdbcTemplate-like abstraction over BLOBs in
PostgreSQL.
The README contains most of the technical details.
It allows you to deal with large files; ones for which you don't want to load the whole thing into memory, or even onto the local storage on the machine. Java 8 lambdas are used to provide a not-awful API:
blops.store("some key", os -> { /* write to the OutputStream */);
blops.read("other key", (is, meta) -> { /* read the InputStream */);
Here, the (unseekable) Streams are connected directly to the database, with minimal buffering happening locally. You are, of course, free to load the stream into memory as you go; the target project for this library does that in some situations.
In addition to not being so ugly, you get free deduplication and compression, and a place to put your metadata, etc. Please read the README for further details about the project.
And, some observations I had while writing it:
I continue to be surprised at how hard it is to find good advice on locking techniques and patterns for Postgres. For example,
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE pk=5 FOR UPDATE;
... does nothing if the pk=5 doesn't exist (yet). That is, there's
no neat way to block until you know whether you can insert a record.
Typically, you don't want to block, but if your code then progresses
to do:
var a = generateReallySlowThing();
INSERT INTO foo (pk, bar) VALUES (5, a);
COMMIT;
...it seems a shame to have waited for that slow operation, and then
have the INSERT explode on you. The "best" solution here appears
to insert a blank record, commit, then lock the record, do your slow
operation, and then update it. As far as I'm aware, none of the
UPSERT related changes in PostgreSQL 9.5
help with this case at all. I would love to link to a decent discussion
of this... but I'm not aware of one.
A similar case comes up later, where I wish for INSERT ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING,
which is in PostgreSQL 9.5. Soon.
RSS Feed